<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mahler 4 on my desk</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kennethwoods.net/blog1/2007/08/20/mahler-4-on-my-desk/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kennethwoods.net/blog1/2007/08/20/mahler-4-on-my-desk/</link>
	<description>Music, opinion, life as a performing musician</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 07:43:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://kennethwoods.net/blog1/2007/08/20/mahler-4-on-my-desk/comment-page-1/#comment-81137</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 03:56:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kennethwoods.net/blog1/2007/08/20/mahler-4-on-my-desk/#comment-81137</guid>
		<description>I enjoyed it.
I was thinking about similar things...how for a moment or two (really seconds), it sounds as if it could be Haydn. At the same time, what is it about those few seconds that makes it Haydn-esque? It is a very, very interesting symphony.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I enjoyed it.<br />
I was thinking about similar things&#8230;how for a moment or two (really seconds), it sounds as if it could be Haydn. At the same time, what is it about those few seconds that makes it Haydn-esque? It is a very, very interesting symphony.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kenneth Woods</title>
		<link>http://kennethwoods.net/blog1/2007/08/20/mahler-4-on-my-desk/comment-page-1/#comment-15388</link>
		<dc:creator>Kenneth Woods</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 09:12:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kennethwoods.net/blog1/2007/08/20/mahler-4-on-my-desk/#comment-15388</guid>
		<description>Hi John

Thanks for the note- I appreciate your interest.

I&#039;m sorry if the post disappointed you, but it was just a blog post trying to capture my experience of glancing at a score before I&#039;ve had my coffee. Since I&#039;m conducting the piece in a few weeks, I&#039;m pretty sure there will be plenty more of substance to come about the piece. 

Cheers
Ken</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi John</p>
<p>Thanks for the note- I appreciate your interest.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sorry if the post disappointed you, but it was just a blog post trying to capture my experience of glancing at a score before I&#8217;ve had my coffee. Since I&#8217;m conducting the piece in a few weeks, I&#8217;m pretty sure there will be plenty more of substance to come about the piece. </p>
<p>Cheers<br />
Ken</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://kennethwoods.net/blog1/2007/08/20/mahler-4-on-my-desk/comment-page-1/#comment-15370</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 05:34:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kennethwoods.net/blog1/2007/08/20/mahler-4-on-my-desk/#comment-15370</guid>
		<description>This essay would have been more useful if you could have told us *what* was complex yet seemingly simple about the work/score, instead of repeating that as with haydn, simplicity is serious business.  this essay has zero content, and it could have been fascinating.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This essay would have been more useful if you could have told us *what* was complex yet seemingly simple about the work/score, instead of repeating that as with haydn, simplicity is serious business.  this essay has zero content, and it could have been fascinating.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roni</title>
		<link>http://kennethwoods.net/blog1/2007/08/20/mahler-4-on-my-desk/comment-page-1/#comment-15355</link>
		<dc:creator>Roni</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 01:59:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kennethwoods.net/blog1/2007/08/20/mahler-4-on-my-desk/#comment-15355</guid>
		<description>&gt; &quot;Simple is never simple&quot;

That is probably why such geniuses as Gesualdo, Buxtehude, Handel, Mozart, Schubert – to name a few – are way underestimated, especially comparing to others.

That is probably also the reason why Bach, Beethoven, Schumann, Wagner, Tchaikovsky – and the rest of the pack – are so overestimated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; &#8220;Simple is never simple&#8221;</p>
<p>That is probably why such geniuses as Gesualdo, Buxtehude, Handel, Mozart, Schubert – to name a few – are way underestimated, especially comparing to others.</p>
<p>That is probably also the reason why Bach, Beethoven, Schumann, Wagner, Tchaikovsky – and the rest of the pack – are so overestimated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

