Where has the week gone at Vftp Int’ Headquarters?<\/p>\n
Well, to be honest, the first half of it was given over to recovering from last week, which turned out to be pretty damn draining, and getting out in the sunshine with the kids. Beyond that, there still seemed to be an endless, relentless stream of deadlines. Tonight, I just finished auditioning the final edit\/master of the next Orchestra of the Swan CD, Spring Sounds-Spring Seas, out in June on MSR records. Three world-premieres on that one!<\/p>\n
But, tomorrow, it’s back on the road (assuming there is any petrol to be had), for a busy weekend in Manchester. Then, next week, I’m off to Kent for a week with the Kent County Youth Orchestra, who are going to play Tchaik Six so intensely that audience members’ hair may spontaneously turn white in the Finale.<\/p>\n
Before I head north, two quick thoughts-<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
1-\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 A new kind of G\u00e1l for Ken<\/strong>. I\u2019m conducting G\u00e1l\u2019s fantastic and witty Divertimento for Winds on Saturday with the winds of the Lancashire Chamber Orchestra. It\u2019s the earliest G\u00e1l work I\u2019ve done as a cellist or conductor. Because he had such a long life, it\u2019s easy to think of the works I\u2019ve done from the 1930s like the Violin Concerto or the Serenade for String Trio as \u201cearly\u201d works, but these are the work of a mature master in his 40\u2019s.\u00a0 In fact, the most important sea-change in G\u00e1l\u2019s development as a composer occurred in the late1920\u2019s, when he began to distil his harmonic language from something rather lush, ripe and post-Romantic towards the ever-more subtle and sophisticated vocabularly that he continued to refine until his retirement in the 1980\u2019s. To put it simply, early in his career G\u00e1l probably used more adventurous sounding<\/strong><\/em> chords than one finds in his later music, but the later music is more harmonically complex, sophisticated and nuanced<\/strong><\/em>. Still, the language of the early music is quite seductive, and it\u2019s still obviously the same composer, with the same unique wit. The LCO winds are a very, very good team these days, so I\u2019m sure it will sound wonderfu on Saturday. Also on the program is Haydn\u2019s Symphony no. 83 in G minor, a work of jaw dropping genius and audacity, Mozart\u2019s Adagio and Fugue for Strings and the Mozart Piano Concerto no. 23 in A major with soloist James Dick. Jimmy, who I know from many summers at the Round Top Festival, is a great artist and a former prot\u00e9g\u00e9 of Clifford Curzon. There\u2019s hardly a pianist alive with a more direct connection to Schnabel, so you can bet it will be Mozart of high intellect and refined elegance.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n 2-\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 A couple of weeks ago, I blogged about critic Rick Jones\u2019 less-than-enthusiastic response to my talk (waffling) from the podium a the Cadogan Hall on February 29th<\/sup>. The story has been picked up by writer Gavin Dixon<\/a> on the Gramophone website<\/a>. Dixon points out:<\/p>\n \u201cOne the whole, the reactions have been positive, so it is unlikely that the episode is going to shut Ken up any time soon. But the fact remains that he is one of only a few orchestral conductors working in this country who does talk to his audience. So are we missing out? Could other conductors be providing us with musical insights we might otherwise miss?\u201d<\/p>\n Indeed, although I may tone it down from time to time, I don\u2019t see myself shutting up in the foreseeable future. Fortunately,Dixon comes out in favour of the podium rap:<\/p>\n \u201cBut if it’s done right, the podium introduction can enrich the concert experience, offering information on the music and increasing the sense of communication between the stage and the stalls. Kenneth Woods seems to have got the balance right. His advice to aspiring podium talkers: be brief, warm, avoid jargon, and most importantly of all, don’t take yourself too seriously.\u201d<\/p>\n But when to rap? The received wisdom is exactly as Gavin Dixon suggests:<\/p>\n \u201cSo perhaps the podium talk is the right thing for some events, new music performances and premieres say, but not for others.\u201d<\/p>\n However, I made a conscious decision to talk at the Cadogan Hall before the Elgar String Serenade. Why? Surely such a well known and often-heard piece needs no introduction?<\/p>\n Well, it certainly needs no introduction, but I often think familiar works need a re-introductio<\/strong>n<\/strong><\/em> from time to time. I often like to pick a piece like the Elgar or even Beethoven 5 and take the time to draw the audience in to what we hope to bring to life in the upcoming performance. \u00a0Conversely, maybe sometimes a premiere can benefit from being heard with completely open ears, and save the talk for a post concert talk.<\/p>\n At the end of the day, some of my best raps have come before chestnuts like the Elgar (although I would only give that \u00a0particular rap a 5.2\/10). Some of the worst raps have come before pieces I love dearly- it\u2019s easy to lay it on too thick when you\u2019re madly in love with a score. My way of working with an audience depends on the kind of ease and informality that comes from speaking off-the-cuff, so there are bound to be off nights. When you\u2019re on, however, it\u2019s amazing how far you can take an audience. I did a talk from the podium before a Schumann 3 not long ago that was all about the use of the perfect fourth in the piece, with live demos from the orchestra- pretty technical stuff, but somehow, I managed to draw the audience in and the feedback was overwhelmingly positive. Other nights, you see the first yawn and cut your losses!<\/p>\n <\/p>\n