Ormandy on Sibelius

Eugene Ormandy talks about Sibelius

Meeting Sibelius for the first time, I had the impression of being in the presence of someone almost superhuman.  Here was a being I had admired and looked up to all my life — and suddenly I was in his presence.  He was a towering man, a towering personality, with a magnificent head and powerful face.  His beautiful home was full of records, many of which we had sent him from America throughout the years.  Goddard Lieberson sent him many recordings from Columbia Records.  I remember that I once sent him a recording taken off the air of his Lemminkäinen suite, which we later recorded for Columbia.  He didn’t want it to be performed; that was one of the works he had a strong aversion to, and he wanted to keep the score from the public.  But I managed to get a copy from Helsinki, studied it thoroughly, liked it and performed it.  Then I sent a special recording to Sibelius.  I understand that he put it away for weeks before listening to it.  He was afraid because he was such an uncompromising critic of his own work.  But when he heard it he was pleased and sent me a cable followed by a kind and enthusiastic letter.  When we recorded the work officially, I sent him several copies and he was really touched.  I like to think that I was instrumental in getting Sibelius to appreciate one of his own works!

Sibelius’ First Symphony was the “first” for me in another sense — it was the first of the master’s symphonies I ever conducted.  This was in 1932, with the Minneapolis Symphony Orchestra — and we recorded it for RCA Victor in that year.  I think perhaps it was the first Sibelius symphony to be recorded outside of Scandinavia.  Of course the great Finnish conductor, Sibelius’ friend Kajanus, had broken ground for Sibelius years before, and so had Koussevitzky, Stokowski and Beecham.  I have played the First Symphony many times in the intervening thirty years, and it never loses its fascination for me.  Recordings have changed a great deal since 1932, and so have interpretations of his works to the end, and he always had admiration for the work of my colleagues Stokowski and Koussevitzky.  I will risk immodesty to add that he praised my readings too.  His enthusiasm is a source of great pride to me.

Strangely enough, Sibelius has never been popular in the Germanic countries — excepting, of course, Scandinavia. Germany and Austria never took him to their hearts the way the British and we did.  And yet he studied in Germany and the German masters influenced his musical development — I remember a dozen years ago when the State Department asked me to conduct some concerts in Berlin with the RIAS Orchestra.  I programmed the Sibelius Second Symphony and it didn’t take me much more than one measure to realize that the orchestra had never seen it before.  When we had played it through, the very Germanic concertmaster said to me, “This isn’t such a bad work after all,” and left it at that.  The work seemed to make even less of an impression on the critics — one of them began his review with the question, “Why Sibelius?”  Fortunately, there are still a few conductors around whose answer to that question would be, “Because Sibelius is among the giants.”

It is difficult for me to choose a favorite among the seven symphonies of Sibelius.  The first is still under the influence of Tchaikovsky, but it is a healthy thing for a first symphony to recall the past, and Sibelius does so gloriously.  The Second Symphony shows the composer struggling heroically to free himself from this influence, but not fully succeeding; the very tensions created by this struggle give the work its power.  Like the First, it is filled with passages that only Sibelius could have conceived.  The Third I don’t understand, frankly.  The Third and Sixth remain enigmas, as far as I am concerned.  The Fourth I love, the Fifth I love and the Seventh — all of them free, wild, beautiful things, more like elemental forms of nature than consciously shaped works of art.  And I wish I could say that I love the Eighth, too, but alas, like everyone else I have never heard it and don’t know if it exists or ever existed.

The Eighth Symphony is a mysterious subject.  Everytime I saw Sibelius — and I saw him four or five times, perhaps more — in his home about twenty-seven miles away from the city of Helsinki, I asked him about it, sometimes very tactfully, sometimes quite directly.  And his response was always the same:  he became very upset and nervous and quickly changed the subject.  He seemed to be disturbed that anyone should bring up the subject of the Eighth Symphony.  His son-in-law, Jussi Jalas, a very fine conductor and a good friend of mine, had told me that he was convinced that there was an Eighth Symphony.  On the other hand, Sibelius’ oldest daughter assured me that there was no such symphony.  If there was one, he destroyed it.  Sibelius is reputed to have said to intimate friends, “If I cannot write a better symphony than my Seventh, then it shall be my last.”  Apparently he was not satisfied — if he wrote an Eighth Symphony — with what he had done.  At any rate, he seems to have enjoyed the mystery surrounding the existence of the work.

Naturally, I always told him that if and when his Eighth Symphony was ready for performance I hoped he would give me the opportunity to give it its world premiere.  There was never any response:  his fine, nervous hands would begin to tremble even more and he would look away with a troubled expression.  Out of my admiration and respect I would never press the matter, although I felt puzzled and disappointed.  Twice I went to his house with Olin Downes, who was one of his greatest admirers and had written a book about him.  Mr. Downes promised me that he would bring up the subject, because I told him I didn’t dare to anymore.  But he got the same reply, or rather non-reply:  a strange twist in Sibelius’ face, a nervous intensity in his eyes, and the trembling hands.  I said in an aside to Mr. Downes, “We’d better drop the subject.”  We did.  It shall always remain a tantalizing mystery for me.

As wonderful as it was to meet Sibelius for the first time, it was even more wonderful to have been able to introduce him, some years later, to the members of The Philadelphia Orchestra.  That occurred in June 1955, and there is a rather touching story connected with the meeting.  For some months previous I had been in correspondence with Dr. Ringbom, the director of the Helsinki Philharmonic, in order to arrange for the orchestra to meet the master while we were in Finland on tour.  Sibelius was very ill at the time, very old and fragile and tormented by ear trouble.  The day we were to go to his secluded villa at Järvenpää arrived, and though it was cold and raw and raining, the men were as excited and eager as children.  And I was as excited as any of them.  Imagine my disappointment when Dr. Ringbom called to confess that when he had written to me in Philadelphia to say that everything was arranged he had not mentioned that Sibelius himself knew nothing about the projected visit.  He had only spoken to Mrs. Sibelius, who had agreed at the time but now flatly said no, her husband was too ill to receive us.

There we were, in Helsinki, thousands of miles from home and within twenty-seven miles of Sibelius.  “Dr. Ringbom,” I said, “you must not disappoint us.  Please call up Mrs. Sibelius and explain to her that this orchestra, from the very earliest days with Stokowski, has done as much to spread Sibelius’ fame as any orchestra in the world.  All they ask in return is to see him.”  It worked.

My wife and I were havingh tea with him, and the orchestra came in two buses.  Even then he hadn’t been told that they were coming.  He was so sensitive — perhaps the most sensitive, shy man I ever met in my life — that the knowledge that he was to meet 110 musicians would probably have incapacitated him if he were given  too much time to think about it.  And those poor colleagues of mine were standing out in the cold rain with thin raincoats on, waiting!  Finally I took the bull by the horns and said, “Mr. Sibelius, do you know that the entire Philadelphia Orchestra, the orchestra that played your music when nobody else did, is waiting outside, hoping to meet you?  Would you just go out on the balcony and say hello to them?”

“But I cannot speak English well enough,” he protested.  “They will not understand me.”

“Speak German, they’ll understand you.  Just look at them, don’t say anything.”

And so he got his heavy winter coat and hat — there are pictures of that visit — and came out with me.  “Gentlemen,” I said, “Mr. Sibelius needs no introduction.”  They applauded him and bravoed him until I had to tell them, “Gentlemen, Mr. Sibelius is not well, but he wanted to come out and say a few words to you.”  And then he told them, with the beautiful simplicity of his few English words, how grateful he was to them for playing his music so nobly.  At last his oldest daughter pulled him back, saying, “Daddy you’re going to catch cold.”  Fortunately, he didn’t catch cold, but we were worried that he might, for it was bitter that day.

He died two years later, in 1957.  And I think today we perform his music better for the memory of those few minutes when he came out on his porch and spoke to us.  It was an experience that none of us will ever forget.

- Essay from Sibelius: Symphony No. 1 in E-Minor, Op. 39.  The Philadelphia Orchestra, Eugene Ormandy, Conductor.  Columbia Masterworks MS-6395.

Copyrighted material is reproduced here without profit for educational purposes only, and will be removed on request.

 

Share

Crumb

Funny that Roger Bourland at Red Black Window would write about Crumb’s graphic scores at more or less the same time I was talking about score marking, including re-baring some experimentally notated 20th c. works to facilitate performance

 I’ve done a fair bit of Crumb, and, interestingly, I’ve never felt the need to add anything to his notation, and, in fact, have hardly marked his scores at all.

 Is it possible he’s just really good at this whole composition business? Better than most? Did he just think that much harder about his notation than his peers? Could it be?

Hmmm…..

I’ve found his website, and added it to the links listing on your right.

When will someone ask me to conduct Star Child??

 

c. 2006 Kenneth Woods

Share

The halftime show

Normally half-time means you get a break, but the looming renewal of my work visa in the UK (fun, fun) completely killed off my modest three free days last week, and now I am back in the maelstrom after a slightly-more-tiring-than-usual flight over to the US. Nevertheless, I’ve been planning for a while to take a deep breath between the October and November sides of the fall season to gather, and try to express, my thoughts about what I’ve been up to so far, and what I have to look forward to between now and the holiday break. If I have any time later this week, I’ll try to talk about repertoire, and November but today, it’s orchestras since September.

Since coming back from the summer I’ve had concerts with the Kent County Youth Orchestra, the Surrey Mozart Players, the BBC National Orchestra of Wales, the Oregon East Symphony and the Nottingham Philharmonic.

It is both difficult and potentially risky for a conductor to try and comment publicly on the character of an orchestra, or to describe his or her working relationship with them. Much of what goes on in rehearsals should rightly remain private. Don’t look here for a summary of which band has the worst sarrusophone player, or the most miserable principal tambourine specialist. The more experience I get, and the more I understand what it takes to put on a concert and keep an orchestra running, the more I realize that any orchestra that makes it onto the platform must have some pretty unique survival skills and traits that allow it to keep going. Today, I’ll try to describe some of the galvanizing characteristics of these bands.

I’ve written extensively elsewhere on this blog about the sheer exuberance and spirit of the Kent County Youth Orchestra- I don’t think I’ve ever come across a group with more esprit de corps or one that brought more sheer energy to rehearsals and to life between rehearsals. It’s such a treat to work in an environment where we can completely hold the real world a bay until the concert is over.

On the other hand, the majority of the Surrey Mozart Players come from a different generation, and just getting this diverse and very busy group together for four rehearsals is a huge logistical challenge for their organizers. They struggle with two rehearsal venues that are almost painfully loud to play in, which tends to drain us all. However, between last spring’s Beethoven 7 and this fall’s Sibelius 3, I’ve come to recognize that beneath their low-key, mild-mannered and good natured exterior, in concert they can be a fiery bunch who are more than happy to follow you off the edge of the cliff. They took huge risks in the most difficult parts of Sibelius 3 at my behest, and it paid off- not all groups would go to the edge like that.

BBC NOW- well, it’s just a delight to work with a group at that elite level, where you are surrounded by so many great musicians with so much experience. I know them well as conductor, but also as a friend and listener and I never cease to marvel at their ability to not let anything distract them from their work. This time, everyone knew we didn’t have as much rehearsal as the concert needed, but more than once I’ve seen them work through performing situations that no similarly top-flight American orchestra would tolerate to give their very best in concert. They manage to act idealistically without ever talking so- like many major British orchestras their mask of stoic resignation and general pessimism hides a tremendous musical integrity which comes out when they play.

Professionalism is not unique to professional orchestras, and of all the many non-professional orchestras I’ve worked with, none has been as professional as the Nottingham Philharmonic. Knowing very well how hard it is to create and maintain a culture of trust and responsibility in a volunteer organization, I’m just in awe of how incredibly smoothly run they are, and of their uniformly high musical standards. There are a lot of professional orchestras out there in the world that would be more than humbled to hear the NPO play Sibelius.

And then my old traveling companions, the Oregon East Symphony. When I first came to the orchestra, they had worked with only one conductor for 14 years without seeing even a different face for a rehearsal in all that time. They’d never had a rehearsal not on a Thursday night except for dress rehearsals. From my arrival through last year’s Mahler 2, the orchestra has gone through some huge changes, changes which have challenged everyone.

I think we could have all been forgiven for thinking the super-success of the Mahler heralded a new, easier age for the orchestra, and hopes were even higher after we hired a very gifted executive director after a long, difficult search.

Well, it has proven to be a new age, but not, by any means, and easier age. Still, as one critic called us over 25 years ago, the “most remotely situated full symphony orchestra on the planet,” the OES looks more and more to me like one of those tiny scrub trees that sits incongruously just above the proper tree line in the high mountains, clinging to rocky soil and living on dangerously thin air. At the end of the day, there just aren’t that many resources in Eastern Oregon, human or financial, for it to seem possible to support this orchestra. Our October program got hit from all sides, including personnel management, publicity and schedule conflicts.

Perhaps it is impolitic to say it, but I sometimes wonder if all our cyclical discussions about orchestra management, audience building, player relations, the future of classical music, how to rebuild the industry and the like are just bullshit.

I’m not sure I’ve ever seen a process or a practice that could make an organization thrive. If we think there is some magic formula for running or remaking or marketing an orchestra, we’re living in fantasy land. If you want to save or build or improve your orchestra, look for people- look for players, leaders, supporters, listeners. Make relationships. If you say “we should be doing this: then orchestra will thrive,” make damn sure you have the “we” part right, because the “this” part is worthless without it.

OES does some things according to the best of best practices and insists on doing others in a long-ingrained loony, flaky way that never fails to give me ulcers.  

The fact is, our realities change every day. A tsunami hits and half our regular foundations stop giving money to cultural organizations for a year. The stock market drops and endowment funds dry up. A local business is sold to a national company and stops sponsoring concerts. Likewise, new opportunities open up every day, but to grab them you have to be quick and decisive. Opportunity no longer knocks, he drives by your office at sixty miles-per-hour, and you’ve got to run out in the street and stop him. Either way, it’s people that help you weather the storm and people who help you break through to the next level. Each new person who can contribute at that level to your organization is priceless.

After Mahler, this month’s OES concert preparation felt like a sharp kick in the stomach- everything was a problem and everything went wrong. People had to cancel on us. People didn’t have to cancel on us but did anyway because they’re not very nice people (and won’t be invited back again). People were sick, players were hurt, press releases got cut from papers, radio interviews got bumped to make way for politicians, the billboard didn’t go up. Timelines and deadlines clashed with horrific consequences. Michelle, our new executive director, had to weather this shit storm while learning a complex job from scratch and while eight months pregnant, and she still played principal horn (wonderfully) on the concert. That’s a warrior for you. 

In past years when we’ve had problems come up, I’ve spent hours on the phone and email putting out fires, but this time with a funny travel schedule, there was not much I could do but give my all in rehearsals. A whole bunch of people just sort of stepped up beyond what they’d done in the past, some musically, some professionally and some both. We were seriously faced with the prospect of following the most successful event in the orchestra’s history with the biggest flop in a long time, and yet people, not practices, got us through it. Somehow, we did an American in Paris that I would put up next to any recording for energy, precision, dynamics and feel.  Somehow our little scrub tree on the mountain side held on through another winter and another mudslide. In the old age everything finally comes together after 20 years and you get the best concert the orchestra has ever done. In the new age, everything falls appart and you get a concert that was just as good as the best concert you’d ever done.

In the film Gattacca, two brothers, one genetically gifted as an athlete and the other not so, develop a fierce rivalry to see who can swim farther out to sea before turning back. Eventually it is the ungifted brother who completely surpasses the other. Years later, after a long estrangement, his brother asks him how he was able to win, and the character (played by Ethan Hawke) says “I never saved anything for the swim back.”  We try to run a responsible, fiscally conservative, and sustainable organization here, but sometimes you have to decide whether to turn back or keep swimming. It felt pretty great to know that I wasn’t alone in those waters this month, scary as it was. It really hit me just how many comrades-in-arms I’d found here in six years. We’re still, as our principal bassoonist often reminds me, “the best goddamn redneck orchestra in the world.”

BTW- We’ve got one new person in the ‘hood at the OES as of Monday. Michelle gave birth to Miranda Kimie 15 days after the concert. Mother and daughter are both doing great.

c. 2006 Kenneth Woods

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...
Share